Many cosmetic companies, for example, have sought better ways to test their products without the use of animal subjects.
Do they have any rights, or may we do as we please with them?
If animals do not have the same rights as humans, it becomes permissible to use them for research purposes. Another principle is to reduce animal use as far as possible in any given study. The harm that is committed against animals should not be minimized because they are not considered to be "human.
These eyes are considered trash at the slaughterhouses and scientists would only be helping the companies out. In summary, defenders of animal experimentation argue that humans have higher moral status than animals and fundamental rights that animals lack.
In most science classes today students will dissect animals that were caught or even bred just for the purpose to one day be cut open and discussed. Cambridge University Press, These animals are watched over the test period and then killed to find out the organ and body system damages.
In the Draize test the substance or product being tested is placed in the eyes of an animal generally a rabbit is used for this test ; then the animal is monitored for damage to the cornea and other tissues in and near the eye.
If animals were not used in testing, then humans would experience suffering and the health of millions of people would be in danger. Risks are not morally transferable to those who do not choose to take them" qtd. The value that humans place on their own lives should be extended to the lives of animals as well.
In fact, the scientific examination of the question: In most science classes today students will dissect animals that were caught or even bred just for the purpose to one day be cut open and discussed. For reasons of size, price, and time, the vast majority of animal testing are done on rodents.
Animals have different reproductive cycles and life spans than humans so it makes it difficult to extract meaningful information when experimenting in those areas.
But the value we place on the quality of their lives is determined by their perceived value to humans" The tests today are less lethal. Because of this horrendous care that animals are enduring, people debate whether animal testing should be carried out at all.
One of the most popular research paper topics you can choose for writing is pros and cons of animal testing. Animals experience a considerable amount of pain and are subjected to all kinds of suffering including testing as awful as forced diseases, injuries, and enduring a life of isolated captivity.
Nevertheless, despite the belief that animal testing is beneficial, testing animals is actually morally wrong and should not be carried out. Many different tests are done on the animals in order to predict the effect it will have on humans.
However, most people are uncomfortable with that scenario and some philosophers have put forth a variety of reasons to include all humans in the human moral community.Therefore, animal testing is unjust and morally wrong because the tests made on animals are not only dangerous for researchers because of how strongly people oppose animal testing and the tests made on animals may not even predict the human outcomes; so, animal testing must desist.
Animal testing is the use of animals as a substitute or “model” to better understand the physiology of an organism and its response to various factors or substances (to test, verify, and evaluate the safety or toxicity), and especially to.
The Ethics of Animal Experimentation. By Stephanie Liou 06 Jul, Animal Research, animals and aims to avoid unnecessary use of animals in scientific research by pursuing alternatives to animal testing.
potential animal rights violations are outweighed by the greater human benefits of animal research. Animal testing can even be dated back to the ancient times of the Greeks and Romans. Physicians would dissect animals with the pure interest to obtain knowledge. Therefore, animal testing is unjust and morally wrong because the tests made on animals are not only dangerous for researchers because of how strongly people oppose animal testing and the tests made on animals may not even predict the human outcomes; so, animal testing must desist.
Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, animal research, and in vivo testing, is the use of non-human animals in experiments that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under study.Download